Earlier this week, Jon Tjompson CEO and Permanent Secretary of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), addressed the UK Government Treasury Select Committee on Brexit and the cost for the two presented alternstives for Customs, Borders and UK-EU trade post-Brexit.
Mr. Thompson explained how the two alternatives; Option 1: New Customs Partnership (NCP) and Option 2: MaxFac Maximum Facilitation – impacts the private sector.
Here is a link to the session: Jon Thompson addresses Treasury Select Committee
Cyber-anthropologist Amber Case wants to see smarter people instead of smarter technology – using calm tech. “The Tech World’s Titanic is happening right now”, she says.
Self-propelled cars, smartwatches and refrigerators that can tell us when the bananas have become bad.
The Internet of Things – or the Internet of Things – grows in a hurry and development does not seem to stagnate. According to a Pwc report, consumers worldwide spend $ 236 billion on internet of things solutions by 2020. This is an increase of 33 percent from 2015.
“There will be 50 billion connected devices by 2020. We are living in a time of disturbing technology – our interaction with it must be more meaningful,” said the American cyber antropologist Amber Case, who is visiting Stockholm to lecture during the NextM tech event “.
She researches the interaction between man and technology at Harvard and MIT, and has become known as an equal part of conservative as a progressive voice in the tech world.
The reason is that she advocates calm tech and lectures on how the new technology should be quiet, efficient and sustainable – instead of “smart” and hackable.
“It’s about keeping it simple. I love solutions like the toilet sign on an airplane or crossing points. Such solutions have not changed since they were introduced – a sign that they work, “she says to Di Digital.
The aim of calm technology is to shift focus from quantity to quality in the creation of new products and services.
“The Tech World’s Titanic is happening right now. Just look at Facebook’s situation. People will want to use products with more sustainable design and actively review how much time they spend on their technology.”
However, Amber Case has not always bothered the tech companies. In 2010 she herself joined and started one.
Then she launched the Geoloqi positioning service together with Aaron Parecki. The platform helped system developers add site-based features to their apps. But what made the platform unique in the current market was that the user could also decide how long the site should be shared.
Two years later Esri acquired the company. Then Geoloqi had over 1000 customers and had totaled $ 350,000 in capital. In 2015, the service was closed down by Esri.
“I want to. If the culture around the tech companies changes, then I would go back to the old school tech and build everything myself, from scratch.”
Despite her day-to-day profiles, she thinks there are companies that have already entered the right way.
“I love, for example, how Dyson created a new hair dryer – a product that has not been updated in 60 years. It costs $ 600, but is quite quiet. And Philips has developed their products as if they were in an ecosystem, “said Amber Case.
“The problem is expectations of growth. A listed company should not have to make a profit of 5 percent each year. In the end, you grow for growth alone. Take self-driving cars for example. Why are they a good idea for tech companies? Because they give consumers more time to spend in front of screens, “she continues.
“Yes it does. I have lectured with giants like Microsoft and Sonos. Last year, I traveled 100,000 miles worldwide to talk to different industries and consult companies. ”
Amber Case also emphasizes that a key to creating successful and sustained technology can be to give a designer the same influence and status as the CEO.
“Then the rate of development would increase. The goal must be that we will spend more time making smarter people, not increasing companies’ profits and dependence on online devices, “she says.
In years to come, this Real Madrid team will not remember the details of how it moved from mere greatness to genuine legend, of how it etched its name in history alongside the very best club teams soccer has ever produced. This game will be remembered some very specific moments.
Gareth Bale’s two goals off the bench — one a wonder, the other a blunder — gave Real Madrid a 3-1 victory in the Champions League final on Saturday.
The victory was Madrid’s third in a row in the tournament, a feat unseen in the competition since Bayern Munich won three consecutive European Cups from 1974-76. It gave Madrid 13 titles over all, extending its Champions League record, and four in the past five years.
Zinédine Zizou Zidane – what a coach.
But two questions remains, what would have happened if Mo Salah would have been allowed to play the entire game.
And what if Liverpool had another goal keeper….
– A move by the United States to explore tariffs on auto imports is based on flimsy logic and is part of the pressure from Washington to renegotiate the NAFTA trade pact, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Wednesday.
In an interview with Reuters, Trudeau said that while U.S. President Donald Trump had raised the idea of punitive measures, there was no guarantee they will happen.
Trudeau also predicted talk of tariffs would likely disappear if slow-moving negotiations to update the North American Free Trade Agreement – currently stuck on autos issues – are successful.
Here is a link tobyhe entire article; Trudeau on trade
Today I was in the Parliament Building in Westminister,invited to give testimony about potential post-Brexit customs and border solutions to the House Of Lords EU External Affairs Sub-Committee.
The hearing was broadcasted by Parliamentlive.tv
It was an interesting hearing with good discussions and relevant questions from the Commiittee Members from the House of Lords. All documented in public.
Here with fellow panelist Stephen Adams.
The work on Customs, Border and Trade solutions is very much in the center of the Brexit negotiations right now.
There is now also a discusion about the entire scope of the border issue, includkng all borders whichbis good. In addition it is not only the revenue related matters that are on the table but also a necessary debate on other border procedures related to non-tariff barriers.
We know from international studies that non-tariff barriers in most cases are more expensive for traders than the duties and taxes involved in international trade. This needs to be solved for all options presently discussed.
Finally – a message for media
To media, I want to say the following. I will not give any comments on my testimony to the House of Lords.
After the presentation to the European Parliament, in November 2017, I did approximately fifty interviews for media.
I have during the last two months recieved more than one hundred additional requests for interviews, TV programmes, radio or to make comments. This is flattering and I am grateful for the interest. I thank you for contacting me.
However, after my testimony to the House of Commons, Exiting the European Union Committee in March – I decided not to do more media interviews.
What I had to say regarding my SmartBorder 2.0 report, and proposals in it, is available in the public domain.
I am always willing to support stakeholders involved in the search for good solutions in the field I have worked in the last 35 years, but I will not enter the political debate. Others do this better.
I am a technical expert and I will – if asked – continue to give advice to those involved in the development of the post-Brexit environment. The advice will be given directly to those concerned.
Thank you for your understanding.
Gerald Chirinda has on the Wirld Economic Forum blog written an interesting article about empiwerment of African women. Here it is:
“Women have long suffered stigmatization and marginalization globally. The number of women who still face challenges in reaching their full potential due to an uneven playing field is too high. Even still, I am encouraged by the women who have remained resilient in the face of adversity and committed to achieving their calling and purpose in life.
In a previous article, I wrote about the big questions for Africa’s next three decades, and it would be disingenuous to continue along this path without celebrating women and the extremely important role that they play on our continent. In December 2017, I had the privilege of participating in a meeting at Wilton Park on Taking Forward the Women’s Economic Empowerment Agenda, which brought together a diverse group of approximately 60 participants from 26 countries representing government, civil society and the private sector. This gathering gave me an opportunity to not only learn, but also un-learn some adverse norms and perceptions. Having been fortunate to grow up in Zimbabwe, in an era where women have been to a certain extent empowered, I have seen the positive results that empowerment brings.
Why women’s economic empowerment is important
I ask myself, what the world would look like if more women were empowered. In my research I was encouraged to learn that the highest share of women in the workforce globally are found in Africa, Zimbabwe being the highest with 52.8% and a Sub-Saharan average of 40%. However, women across the continent are more likely to be in informal employment relative to men. In the private sector, African women hold 23% of positions at executive committee level compared to a global average of 20 percent. At CEO level that number drops to 5 percent compared to a global average of 4 percent. Based on these statistics, it’s clear that the world has a long way to go when it comes to unlocking the gender dividend through the economic empowerment of women.
Author: Gerald Chirinda
Obstacles to women obtaining economic power
Regardless of the nature of employment (formal or informal), this issue needs to be addressed. An enabling environment has to be created at every level of society, starting within households. The home is where attitudes, ideas, values and beliefs are shaped and it is important that parents and guardians instill the right values and beliefs, as they work as enablers and catalysts for their children’s success. A child’s formative years are when cultures and norms are molded. It is important for parents to invest their time and be intentional in positively influencing and encouraging their daughters. It is equally important to teach boys the importance of respecting, honoring and empowering women. A study conducted by Legatum Institute shows that parenting courses are useful for embedding skills and values, however their impact is not being seen at scale due to two reasons – take up is limited and courses are limited in duration.
1). Limited take up is due to:
· Stigma: the politicization of parenting courses has often led the public to associate them with ‘troubled families’ and ‘poor parenting’
· Accessibility: courses should be delivered locally, with childcare provision, and in the evening after work
· Familiarity: parents needed to feel comfortable with the venue of the courses (schools, children’s centre, local church) and with the trainer or facilitators
2. Limited duration is due to:
· Cost: budget cuts have meant many local authorities are cutting back on even low-cost courses. Training is expensive for small charities or private enterprises
· Priority: while some local authorities prioritise parenting, some do not
· Format: due the the format of some of the courses, they become expensive to deliver”
Source: WEF, author Gerald Chirinda