The European Union has issued a 16-page document outlining the preparations that need to be made for Brexit. It includes advice on how countries, companies and individuals should prepare for the prospect of the UK leaving with “no deal” in place.

Here are some key excerpts, and explanations of what they mean:

‘Significant disruption’

From the outset, the EU makes one thing clear – even if negotiations go better than expected, it thinks there will be significant disruption, and everyone needs to be ready for it. (The EU talks about 30 March as exit day, by the way, because the precise time of withdrawal is due to be midnight on 30 March in Central European Time, but 23:00 on 29 March in GMT).

The document emphasises that negotiations on a withdrawal agreement are continuing and that a negotiated settlement is the EU’s preferred outcome.

But it also notes that important issues remain unresolved – including on the protection of personal data sent to the UK while it was a member state and on the role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in policing a withdrawal agreement.

In particular, it states that there has been “no progress” in agreeing a “backstop” solution to avoid the imposition of a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

The EU notes, as it has done many times before, that time to both reach and ratify an agreement is running short.

‘No deal’

This is why preparations for “no deal” are so important.

If there is a deal, there will also be a transition period running until 31 December 2020 during which EU rules and regulations will continue to apply in the UK.

That will give businesses and governments more time to prepare for a new relationship.

Without a deal, the transition (or “implementation period” as the UK government calls it) falls away and the relationship will change abruptly at the end of March next year.

If both sides come to the conclusion several months before the end of March that there will be “no deal”, they can at least make some contingency plans to deal with that.

But if there is a last-minute hitch, time will have run out.

So, from the EU’s perspective, thinking about “no deal” means “preparing for the worst and hoping for the best”.

Much of the UK government would probably look at it in the same way – but there are many Brexiteers who think that “no deal” would be perfectly acceptable as long as sufficient preparations have been made.

Stepping up preparation

This kind of language is scattered throughout the document. “Don’t say we didn’t warn you,” would be another way of putting it.

The document stresses that some things will have to be done whatever the outcome.

One thing it mentions is the need for companies to take steps to ensure that they have the right authorisations and certificates to access the EU market after Brexit.

But contingency planning for “no deal” is the main emphasis – the EU says this is a prudent step because the outcome of negotiations “cannot be predicted”.

Among other issues, it notes that there would be no arrangement in place for EU citizens in the UK or UK citizens in the EU.

It says controls at borders “could cause significant delays, eg in road transport, and difficulties for ports”, where there could be “long lines of vehicles waiting for customs procedures to be fulfilled”.

It also says that the UK would become a third country for trade and regulatory issues, which would “represent a significant drawback compared to the current level of market integration”.

It also emphasises that while many measures would have to be taken at EU level, national, regional and local governments also need to step up their levels of preparation to “mitigate the worst impacts of a potential cliff-edge scenario” – cheerful stuff.

Business preparation

And of course a lot of the attention is focused on making sure that individual EU businesses, big and small, are going to be ready for whatever emerges at the end of a highly unpredictable process of negotiation.

The document notes that several EU governments, such as the Irish and the Dutch , have set up online platforms to help their companies prepare for different potential Brexit scenarios.

The document also claims – in a sentence that won’t please the UK government – that “many companies are relocating to the EU27” or expanding their operations there.

EU officials insist that they are not trying to add fuel to the fire and that they are simply engaged in prudent planning.

But it’s a reminder that there are people in Europe, as well as in the UK, who see Brexit as an opportunity rather than a threat.

Legal and technical implications

The commission has now published 68 notices (anyone with a few hours to spare can read them here ) on preparations in specific sectors of the economy, including health and food safety, financial services, customs, transport, and company law.

They set out the legal and technical issues that governments and companies need to take into account and are another glimpse into the complexities of Brexit that stretch into every area of economic life.

In the UK, the government has not yet published any comparable information of its own.

However, on Wednesday, Theresa May told MPs at the Liaison Committee that a similar number of technical notifications about what to do in the event of a “no deal” Brexit will be released during August and September – aimed at businesses and citizens.

In response to the EU document, the Department for Exiting the European Union said “It is the duty of any responsible government to prepare for every eventuality, including the unlikely scenario that we reach March 2019 without agreeing a deal. We have already done a lot of work behind the scenes to prepare for this – it is only natural that our European partners would seek to make similar preparations. We are keen to work closely with the EU on preparedness issues.”

Access to databases

There are all sorts of EU databases, including many dealing with policing and internal security issues, to which the UK wants to retain access after Brexit.

But the EU has argued that the UK can’t simply pick and choose the bits of membership it likes – and this part of the document emphasises that work is well under way to remove the UK from numerous databases and IT systems once it becomes a “third country”.

The commission is also making preparations for changing international agreements that currently involve the UK as a member state. It says it will notify its international partners formally once it has sufficient certainty about the outcome of the current negotiations – not for a while, then.

Finally, the EU document says work is under way to relocate or reassign tasks that are currently performed in the UK – such as the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre (part of the EU’s project for satellites in space) or the UK-based EU Reference Laboratories – because it will not be possible “to entrust a third country” with such EU tasks after the withdrawal date.

Two London-based agencies, the European Medicines Agency and the European Banking Authority, are already moving to Amsterdam and Paris respectively.

EU Preparation document

BBC EU preparations for ‘No Deal’

Source: BBC

WTO celebrated the Centenary mark of Nelson Mandela, with publishing the speech he gave at the WTO ministerial in 1998 marking the 50th anniversary of the GATT.

Link to the speech

At the EU-Japan summit in Tokyo, Presidents Jean-Claude Juncker and Donald Tusk, and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, signed today the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA).

The trade agreement is the biggest ever negotiated by the EU and will create an open trade zone covering over 600 million people.

As a response to the last months developments in relation to an emerging trade war this is a powerful step forward for world trade.

President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker said: “The document we signed today is much more than a trade agreement. It is of course a tool that will create opportunities for our companies, our workers and our citizens and that will boost the European and Japanese economies. But it is also a statement. For its content, its scope and also its timing. It is a statement by two likeminded partners that together represent nearly a third of the world’s GDP and reiterate their commitment to uphold the highest standards in areas such as labour, safety, environmental or consumer protection.

And what we’re saying is that we believe in open, fair and rules-based trade. What we are saying is that a trade agreement is not a zero sum game, but a win-win for the involved parties. This agreement will bring tangible benefits to both sides and at the same time safeguard each other’s sensitivities.”

Cecilia Malmström, Commissioner for Trade, said: “Together with Japan, we are sending a strong signal to the world that two of its biggest economies still believe in open trade, opposing both unilateralism and protectionism. The economic benefits of this agreement are clear. By removing billions of euros of duties, simplifying customs procedures and tackling behind-the-border barriers to trade, it will offer opportunities for companies on both sides to boost their exports and expand their business.

The European agriculture sector in particular has something to celebrate, with access to the enormous Japanese market and protection for over 200 distinctive food and drinks like Champagne and Parma ham. I now call on the European Parliament to approve this agreement quickly so that firms, citizens and farmers can reap the benefits as soon as possible.”

The agreement will remove the vast majority of the €1 billion of duties paid annually by EU companies exporting to Japan, and has led to the removal of a number of long-standing regulatory barriers, for example on cars. It will also open up the Japanese market of 127 million consumers to key EU agricultural exports and will increase EU export opportunities in a range of other sectors.

The Economic Partnership Agreement will also in addition strengthen cooperation between Europe and Japan in a range of areas, reaffirm their shared commitment to sustainable development, and include for the first time a specific commitment to the Paris climate agreement.

Read more here: EU Japan Trade Deal